refactor: ApplyFlags with prefix for Remote and Target#1733
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
The E2E test failed, oops |
Contributor
|
This PR breaks |
Contributor
That's why the E2E fails initialization. |
qweeah
reviewed
May 26, 2025
1944119 to
5b8a84f
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1733 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.43% 85.39% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 137 137
Lines 5951 5950 -1
==========================================
- Hits 5084 5081 -3
- Misses 616 618 +2
Partials 251 251 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Member
Author
|
Fixed this a while back |
Wwwsylvia
reviewed
Jul 3, 2025
b2647cd to
03768fe
Compare
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refactors flag registration for Target, Remote, and related types to centralize prefix and description handling, and adds a test for conflicting OCI layout flags.
- Introduces
setFlagDetailsonTargetto setprefix/descriptionbeforeApplyFlags - Updates
Remote.ApplyFlagsWithPrefixto guard duplicate flags and usedescription - Refactors
BinaryTargetto use the newTargetprefix API and adds a new unit test
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| cmd/oras/internal/option/target.go | Removed old applyFlagsWithPrefix, added setFlagDetails and updated ApplyFlags call |
| cmd/oras/internal/option/remote.go | Dropped applyPrefix, added fs.Lookup guards, switched to description |
| cmd/oras/internal/option/spec.go | Simplified prefix usage in ApplyFlagsWithPrefix |
| cmd/oras/internal/option/binary_target.go | Switched to setFlagDetails + ApplyFlags for From/To |
| cmd/oras/internal/option/target_test.go | Added TestTarget_Parse_to_oci_and_oci_path |
03768fe to
532b045
Compare
Wwwsylvia
reviewed
Jul 8, 2025
532b045 to
ffff703
Compare
shizhMSFT
reviewed
Jul 9, 2025
ffff703 to
cb26304
Compare
Signed-off-by: Terry Howe <terrylhowe@gmail.com>
cb26304 to
00e5c86
Compare
This was referenced Aug 7, 2025
6 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
It kind of looks like this Target/Remote code was in the middle of some refactor that was never completed. This doesn't address all the issues, but it does clean up flag/prefix/description handling a bit.