@sawa3030, could you review this PR?

I found that the text AutoSampler is displayed in red, even though the link functions correctly and redirects to the corresponding documentation. This behavior appears unintended and undesirable. Could you please update this?

I’m aware that the text for AutoSampler is showing up in red. If you want to update it, could you please suggest a concrete solution?
As far as I know, the only way to make it exactly the same as the other samplers is to use custom CSS. As I mentioned above, AutoSampler cannot use cross-references, since its documentation is not based on Sphinx but on its own system.

cf. In the original state, it had no link at all and wasn’t even shown as inline code.

I also made the following two update:

• Update the order in the autosummary section to match the table, whose order was updated in the previous PR (Update the table of Samplers in docs #6287).
• Add NSGAIIISampler to the note, since it has the same exception as NSGAIISampler but was missed in the previous PR (Update the table of Samplers in docs #6287), which added NSGAIIISampler to this document.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.10%. Comparing base (6624800) to head (e046e95).
⚠️ Report is 79 commits behind head on master.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6290      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.15%   89.10%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         209      209              
  Lines       13908    13919      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        12399    12402       +3     
- Misses       1509     1517       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.