Refactor return style #6136#6151
Merged
nabenabe0928 merged 1 commit intooptuna:masterfrom Jun 13, 2025
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
This PR updates the return statement style in
optuna/storages/_rdb/alembic/versions/v3.0.0.c.pyto follow Optuna’s convention of using tuple unpacking without parentheses, i.e.,return a, binstead ofreturn (a, b).Motivation:
According to the project’s code style and consistency guidelines (referenced in issue #6136), Optuna prefers return a, b over return (a, b) when returning multiple values. This change aligns the file with that convention and improves consistency across the codebase.
Note:
The changes made in the file did not change any logic of the code.