JavaxMailToJakartaMail recipe should support the migration of javax.mail:mail#721
Merged
Merged
Conversation
jevanlingen
approved these changes
May 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
timtebeek
reviewed
May 16, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's changed?
The declarative recipe
JavaxMailToJakartaMail.What's your motivation?
The JavaxMailToJakartaMail recipe currently only migrates the dependency
javax.mail:javax.mail-apitojakarta.mail:jakarta.mail-api. Some projects may still use the legacy Java Mail dependencyjavax.mail:mailwhich is not supported for migration yet.Anything in particular you'd like reviewers to focus on?
No
Anyone you would like to review specifically?
No
Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?
There are no alternatives.
Any additional context
No