Skip to content

Improved bouncy castle implementation#707

Merged
timtebeek merged 3 commits intomainfrom
feature/improve_bouncy_castle
Apr 18, 2025
Merged

Improved bouncy castle implementation#707
timtebeek merged 3 commits intomainfrom
feature/improve_bouncy_castle

Conversation

@JohannisK
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's changed?

  • Removed upgrade to java 8
  • Improved tests

@JohannisK JohannisK self-assigned this Apr 18, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In Progress in OpenRewrite Apr 18, 2025
@JohannisK JohannisK requested a review from timtebeek April 18, 2025 13:29
@JohannisK JohannisK force-pushed the feature/improve_bouncy_castle branch from da8f984 to 63da7ab Compare April 18, 2025 13:29
.containsPattern("\\h*<groupId>org\\.bouncycastle<\\/groupId>\\s+<artifactId>bcpkix-jdk18on<\\/artifactId>\\s+<version>.*<\\/version>")
.actual())
spec -> {
spec.after(e -> e);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It only works when I include the spec.after, jus spec.afterRecipe is not enough as shown by the test below.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes, without that after you'd be asserting no change is made, but that it's parser correctly. Added that now.

github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Ready to Review in OpenRewrite Apr 18, 2025
@timtebeek timtebeek merged commit d041023 into main Apr 18, 2025
2 checks passed
@timtebeek timtebeek deleted the feature/improve_bouncy_castle branch April 18, 2025 17:18
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready to Review to Done in OpenRewrite Apr 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants