Skip to content

Conversation

@aaguiarz
Copy link
Member

@aaguiarz aaguiarz commented Jul 31, 2025

Potential fix for https://github.com/openfga/java-sdk/security/code-scanning/2

To fix the problem, add a permissions block to the workflow to restrict the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN to the minimum required. In this case, the workflow only needs to read repository contents (for actions/checkout and FOSSA scans), so setting contents: read is sufficient. The best way to do this is to add the following block at the root level of the workflow (just after the name: and before on:), so it applies to all jobs unless overridden. No additional imports or definitions are needed.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow configuration to specify repository permissions for improved security.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for FOSSA was updated to include an explicit permissions section, granting the workflow read access to repository contents. No other modifications were made to the workflow's logic, triggers, or steps.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
FOSSA Workflow Permissions Update
.github/workflows/fossa.yaml
Added explicit permissions section with contents: read to define workflow access rights.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch alert-autofix-2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aaguiarz aaguiarz marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2025 01:17
@aaguiarz aaguiarz requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2025 01:17
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 33.73%. Comparing base (2a253da) to head (5f43c04).

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (33.73%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #191   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     33.73%   33.73%           
  Complexity     1005     1005           
=========================================
  Files           182      182           
  Lines          6900     6900           
  Branches        778      778           
=========================================
  Hits           2328     2328           
  Misses         4467     4467           
  Partials        105      105           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rhamzeh rhamzeh added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 1, 2025
@rhamzeh rhamzeh removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Aug 1, 2025
@jimmyjames jimmyjames added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 1, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 18ef030 Aug 1, 2025
24 checks passed
@jimmyjames jimmyjames deleted the alert-autofix-2 branch August 1, 2025 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants