improvements on tests of imagecodecs module#25525
Conversation
cd6cce4 to
f925363
Compare
9e41d0b to
8fa2fb7
Compare
|
i was not intending to prepare a PR to merge. but now i thing the proposed changes will be useful. please review and consider the file changes baboon.ppm and read.png ( let me create a PR to opencv_extra if this PR acceptable) |
|
@sturkmen72 What is your motivation of png -> ppm replacement? |
As a final word, the proposed changes are open to discussion. It may be unimportant. Let me do required changes according devs opinions. |
|
@mshabunin @opencv-alalek what is you opinion? |
| "readwrite/uint16-mono2.dcm", | ||
| "readwrite/uint8-rgb.dcm", | ||
| #endif | ||
| #if defined(HAVE_PNG) || defined(HAVE_SPNG) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have GDAL library integration which should support all these image types (PNG, JPEG, TIFF). Perhaps it should be accounted too, though I didn't try to test GDAL backend specifically (with no other backends).
68f2fad to
f3199a0
Compare
|
I would choose beautiful Lena over less-than-beautiful baboon. Honestly, I don't see any real justification to make this change. |
[WIP] trivial improvements on tests of imagecodecs module