Skip to content

Rename jobs for better understanding for branch 3.4#22185

Merged
alalek merged 3 commits intoopencv:3.4from
fengyuentau:ci_job_rename_3.4
Jul 4, 2022
Merged

Rename jobs for better understanding for branch 3.4#22185
alalek merged 3 commits intoopencv:3.4from
fengyuentau:ci_job_rename_3.4

Conversation

@fengyuentau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fengyuentau fengyuentau commented Jul 4, 2022

I am using a ultrawide monitor and the names in the status box look good on my side. Please take a look on your side whether the name is too long to fit in the status box.

cc @ShiqiYu , please take a look as well.

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to the proper branch
  • There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
  • The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake

@fengyuentau fengyuentau requested review from alalek and asenyaev July 4, 2022 07:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@asenyaev asenyaev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! 👍

@alalek alalek merged commit 2920a8e into opencv:3.4 Jul 4, 2022
@fengyuentau fengyuentau deleted the ci_job_rename_3.4 branch July 5, 2022 02:06
@alalek alalek mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2022
This was referenced Aug 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI/CD: GitHub Actions (GHA) Changes related to CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants