Hi @rogday, How is the PR progress so far? Maybe I can do something if you want.

Hi @zihaomu, I think we need to wait for merge of @fengyuentau's extra blobs info so that we can reuse it for 1-d and 0-d support here. Otherwise I think it's pretty much done.

Hello @rogday , we came across the problem of lacking support for gather op with multiple indices. I wonder if you have time working on this pull request. If no, me or someone on my side can help you finish this pull request.

Hello @rogday , we came across the problem of lacking support for gather op with multiple indices. I wonder if you have time working on this pull request. If no, me or someone on my side can help you finish this pull request.

Hi! Sorry for the delay. I'll give it a shot next week. Would you be okay with that?

I'll give it a shot next week. Would you be okay with that?

Sure, no problem. Thank you!

In case you need a ONNX model for testing, here is the one I used: gather_multiple_indices.onnx.zip. It is the same operator that dnn does support in the model as mentioned above, and is generated with my script.

Could we turn on some onnx conformance tests of gather? Others look good to me

Unfortunately no - type(integer indices) and shape(less than 2d) issues in non-const context aren't handled by this PR.