Skip to content

fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity#87550

Open
clawsweeper[bot] wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374
Open

fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity#87550
clawsweeper[bot] wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374

Conversation

@clawsweeper

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Makes #87374 merge-ready for the ClawSweeper automerge loop.
The edit pass should inspect the live PR diff, review comments, and failing checks; rebase if needed; keep the contributor branch credited; and stop only when validation is green or an external blocker is proven.

ClawSweeper 🐠 replacement reef notes:

  • Repair fallback: GitHub rejected the repair branch push because it updates workflow files and the ClawSweeper app token does not have workflows permission

Inherited issue-closing references from the source PR:
Closes #87310

Co-author credit kept:

fish notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against dce1dc0.

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added size: M clawsweeper:automerge Maintainer opted this PR into bounded ClawSweeper-reviewed automerge proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. P1 High-priority user-facing bug, regression, or broken workflow. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. status: 🚀 automerge armed This PR is in ClawSweeper's automerge lane. clawsweeper Tracked by ClawSweeper automation labels May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot mentioned this pull request May 28, 2026
Closed
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 28, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed May 29, 2026, 1:10 AM ET / 05:10 UTC.

Summary
Review failed before ClawSweeper could summarize the requested change.

PR surface: Source +192, Tests +379. Total +571 across 10 files.

Reproducibility: unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Review metrics: none identified.

Merge readiness
Overall: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Proof: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Patch quality: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Result: rating does not apply to this item.

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch.

Risk before merge

  • [P1] No close action taken because the review did not complete.

Maintainer options:

  1. Decide the mitigation before merge
    Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.
  2. Pause or close
    Do not merge this PR until maintainers decide whether the risk is worth taking.

Next step before merge

  • Review did not complete, so no work-lane recommendation was made.
Review details

Best possible solution:

Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Unclear. Retry the review first so ClawSweeper can evaluate the actual issue and fix direction.

AGENTS.md: unclear because the file could not be read completely.

Codex review notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against 5fb83af3e389.

Label changes

Label changes:

  • add rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.
  • remove proof: sufficient: Current real behavior proof status is not_applicable, not sufficient.
  • remove P1: Current review triage priority is none.
  • remove rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Current PR rating is rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool, so this older rating label is no longer current.
  • remove merge-risk: 🚨 session-state: Current PR review selected no merge-risk labels.

Label justifications:

  • rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.
  • status: 🚀 automerge armed: This PR is in ClawSweeper's automerge lane. Not applicable: Real behavior proof was not assessed because the Codex review failed.
Evidence reviewed

PR surface:

Source +192, Tests +379. Total +571 across 10 files.

View PR surface stats
Area Files Added Removed Net
Source 5 203 11 +192
Tests 5 382 3 +379
Docs 0 0 0 0
Config 0 0 0 0
Generated 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0
Total 10 585 14 +571

What I checked:

  • failure reason: codex execution failed.
  • codex failure detail: Codex review failed for this PR with exit 1.
  • codex stdout: Per-item Codex failure; continuing with the rest of the shard.

Likely related people:

  • unknown: Codex failed before it could trace repository history. (role: review did not complete; confidence: low)
What the crustacean ranks mean
  • 🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
  • 🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
  • 🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
  • 🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
  • 🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
  • 🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
  • 🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

How this review workflow works
  • ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
  • Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
  • A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
  • PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
  • Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
  • Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
  • Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
  • Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

@openclaw-barnacle openclaw-barnacle Bot removed the proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ClawSweeper PR egg: ✨ hatched 🥚 common Cosmic Crabkin. Rarity: 🥚 common. Trait: guards the happy path.

Details

Share on X: post this hatch
Copy: My PR egg hatched a 🥚 common Cosmic Crabkin in ClawSweeper.
Hatchability:

  • Merged PRs are hatchable.
  • Open PRs are hatchable when they are status: 👀 ready for maintainer look, status: 🚀 automerge armed, or labeled clawsweeper:automerge.
  • Closed unmerged PRs are hatchable only when one of those hatchable labels is still present in the durable record.

About:

  • Eggs appear after real-behavior proof passes. They are collectible flavor only.
  • Review momentum changes the shell state: follow-up work warms it, re-review makes it wobble, and a clean final review lets it hatch.
  • The hatch is seeded from this repository and PR number, so the same PR keeps the same creature; the reviewed head SHA can only change safe visual details.
  • Rarity is just collectible sparkle: 🥚 common, 🌱 uncommon, 💎 rare, ✨ glimmer, and 🌈 legendary.

@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 28, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🦞🔧
ClawSweeper saw the passing review, but the PR needs another repair pass before merge.

Source: clawsweeper[bot]
Feedback: structured ClawSweeper verdict: pass (sha=e32fc453ae5aa22221d6f1590e445bf3df8615b9); current checks are failing: dependency-guard:FAILURE, checks-node-agentic-agents:FAILURE
Action: repair worker queued. Run: https://github.com/openclaw/clawsweeper/actions/runs/26618443543
Model: gpt-5.5

I will update this PR branch, or open a safe credited replacement, if the repair worker finds a narrow CI fix.

Automerge progress:

  • 2026-05-28 18:34:41 UTC merge check queued e32fc453ae5a (GitHub checks failed: checks-node-agentic-agents:FAILURE)
  • 2026-05-28 18:43:02 UTC review queued e32fc453ae5a (queued)
  • 2026-05-28 19:09:31 UTC merge check queued e32fc453ae5a (GitHub checks failed: checks-node-agentic-agents:FAILURE)
  • 2026-05-29 04:42:37 UTC review passed e32fc453ae5a (structured ClawSweeper verdict: pass (sha=e32fc453ae5aa22221d6f1590e445bf3df861...)

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added the merge-risk: 🚨 session-state 🚨 May lose, corrupt, stale, or mis-associate session, agent, or context state. label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot force-pushed the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374 branch from 6c204a4 to 1bd8516 Compare May 28, 2026 07:05
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added the proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. label May 28, 2026
@openclaw-barnacle openclaw-barnacle Bot removed the proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. and removed rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. labels May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot force-pushed the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374 branch 2 times, most recently from 2bca356 to 99b4d3d Compare May 28, 2026 07:41
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. labels May 28, 2026
@openclaw-barnacle openclaw-barnacle Bot removed the proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool PR readiness rating does not apply to this item. and removed proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. labels May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot force-pushed the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374 branch from 99b4d3d to 5dda835 Compare May 28, 2026 08:23
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added the proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot removed the rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🦞👀
ClawSweeper picked this up.

Command router queued. I will update this comment with the next step.

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot force-pushed the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374 branch from 9c3be05 to a6835cc Compare May 28, 2026 10:23
@openclaw-barnacle openclaw-barnacle Bot added the gateway Gateway runtime label May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🧂 unranked krab Not merge-ready due to missing proof or serious correctness/safety concerns. and removed rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. labels May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot force-pushed the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374 branch from a6835cc to d72c7d5 Compare May 28, 2026 16:49
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. and removed rating: 🧂 unranked krab Not merge-ready due to missing proof or serious correctness/safety concerns. labels May 28, 2026
TurboTheTurtle and others added 9 commits May 28, 2026 17:31
@TurboTheTurtle @clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
507c748
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
3a393b0
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
ee4af41 
Co-authored-by: Andy Ye <35905412+TurboTheTurtle@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
cba73c8 
Co-authored-by: Andy Ye <35905412+TurboTheTurtle@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
0775102
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
7d941f8 
Co-authored-by: Andy Ye <35905412+TurboTheTurtle@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
8d0a8a9
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
df54898
@clawsweeper
fix(diagnostics): clear stale session activity
e32fc45
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot force-pushed the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-87374 branch from d72c7d5 to e32fc45 Compare May 28, 2026 17:31
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. and removed rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. labels May 28, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool PR readiness rating does not apply to this item. clawsweeper:human-review Needs maintainer review before ClawSweeper can continue and removed proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. labels May 29, 2026
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🦞✅
ClawSweeper is pausing this repair loop for human review.

Source: clawsweeper[bot]
Reason: - Review did not complete, so no work-lane recommendation was made. (sha=e32fc453ae5aa22221d6f1590e445bf3df8615b9)

Why human review is needed:
ClawSweeper found a blocker that should be resolved or accepted by a maintainer before the repair or automerge loop continues.

What the maintainer can do as a next step:
If the maintainer accepts the current risk and wants ClawSweeper to continue merge gates, comment @clawsweeper approve. If more work is needed, resolve the blocker first, then comment @clawsweeper automerge to re-review and continue. If automation should stay paused, leave clawsweeper:human-review in place or comment @clawsweeper stop.

I added clawsweeper:human-review and left the final call with a maintainer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

clawsweeper:automerge Maintainer opted this PR into bounded ClawSweeper-reviewed automerge clawsweeper:human-review Needs maintainer review before ClawSweeper can continue clawsweeper Tracked by ClawSweeper automation gateway Gateway runtime merge-risk: 🚨 session-state 🚨 May lose, corrupt, stale, or mis-associate session, agent, or context state. P1 High-priority user-facing bug, regression, or broken workflow. rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool PR readiness rating does not apply to this item. size: L status: 🚀 automerge armed This PR is in ClawSweeper's automerge lane.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Stale diagnostic tool_call activity can survive recovery/reset and re-block sessions as blocked_tool_call

2 participants

@RomneyDa @TurboTheTurtle