feat(ui): tool name style in usage panel#42197
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: be591b7594
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Greptile SummaryThis PR improves the tool/skill/file name display in the usage panel's context breakdown by adding CSS truncation with
Confidence Score: 4/5
Last reviewed commit: be591b7 |
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale due to inactivity. |
|
Codex review: needs changes before merge. Workflow note: Future ClawSweeper reviews update this same comment in place. How this review workflow works
Summary Reproducibility: yes. at source/proof level: current main lacks the three PR rating Rank-up moves:
What the crustacean ranks mean
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics. PR egg Rarity: 🥚 common. What is this egg doing here?
Real behavior proof Mantis proof suggestion Risk before merge
Maintainer options:
Next step before merge Security Review findings
Review detailsBest possible solution: Refresh the branch so the current renderer keeps the three title attributes and Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Yes at source/proof level: current main lacks the three Is this the best way to solve the issue? Mostly yes: title attributes plus a scoped context-breakdown CSS rule are the narrow maintainable solution. The current branch is not the best merge shape until the CSS moves to Label justifications:
Full review comments:
Overall correctness: patch is incorrect Acceptance criteria:
What I checked:
Likely related people:
Codex review notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against 9b97e1ef2fd2. |
|
@clawsweeper automerge |
|
🦞🔧 Source: I will update this PR branch, or open a safe credited replacement, if the repair worker finds a narrow fix. Automerge progress:
|
|
ClawSweeper 🐠 reef update Thanks for the work here. ClawSweeper could not write to the source branch, so it opened a replacement PR rather than letting the fix drift. attribution still points back here. Why replacement: ClawSweeper could not update the source PR branch directly; GitHub did not grant sufficient push rights to the bot for that branch.
fish notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against 5101461. |
Summary
The tool name style in usage panel
Change Type (select all)
Scope (select all touched areas)
Linked Issue/PR
Before
After