Summary
On OpenClaw 2026.3.31, 2026.4.1, and 2026.4.2, openclaw doctor --fix reports:
No active memory plugin is registered for the current config.
…but openclaw-mem0 is loaded and working normally.
In this setup:
plugins.allow includes openclaw-mem0
plugins.slots.memory is set to openclaw-mem0
plugins.entries.openclaw-mem0.enabled = true
openclaw mem0 stats succeeds and returns live data
- runtime logs show:
openclaw-mem0: registered (mode: platform, user: quark, graph: false, autoRecall: false, autoCapture: true)
So doctor is producing a false-negative memory diagnostic while the plugin is healthy.
Environment
- OpenClaw: reproduced on
2026.3.31, 2026.4.1, 2026.4.2
- Host: macOS (Apple Silicon)
- Memory plugin:
openclaw-mem0
- Memory mode: platform
- User:
quark
Relevant config shape
{
"plugins": {
"allow": ["telegram", "minimax", "openclaw-mem0", "google", "acpx", "browser"],
"slots": {
"memory": "openclaw-mem0"
},
"entries": {
"openclaw-mem0": {
"enabled": true,
"config": {
"apiKey": "<present>",
"userId": "quark",
"autoRecall": false,
"autoCapture": true
}
}
}
}
}
Steps to Reproduce
- Configure
openclaw-mem0 as the active memory plugin via plugins.slots.memory.
- Confirm the plugin is loaded at runtime.
- Run:
- Observe the memory section warning:
No active memory plugin is registered for the current config.
- Immediately run:
Actual Behavior
doctor says no active memory plugin is registered.
At the same time, openclaw mem0 stats returns valid plugin stats, for example:
Mode: platform
User: quark
Total memories: 6
Graph enabled: false
Auto-recall: false, Auto-capture: true
Expected Behavior
If openclaw-mem0 is loaded, configured in plugins.slots.memory, and answering successfully via openclaw mem0 stats, doctor should not claim that no active memory plugin is registered.
At minimum, the diagnostic should distinguish between:
- no memory plugin configured
- memory plugin configured but unhealthy
- memory plugin configured and working
Impact
This is misleading enough to trigger unnecessary incident response after upgrades. In our case, memory was verified working end-to-end (including storing + searching a new memory), but doctor still implied the memory lane was broken.
That makes health reporting harder to trust, especially during upgrade validation.
Summary
On OpenClaw
2026.3.31,2026.4.1, and2026.4.2,openclaw doctor --fixreports:…but
openclaw-mem0is loaded and working normally.In this setup:
plugins.allowincludesopenclaw-mem0plugins.slots.memoryis set toopenclaw-mem0plugins.entries.openclaw-mem0.enabled = trueopenclaw mem0 statssucceeds and returns live dataopenclaw-mem0: registered (mode: platform, user: quark, graph: false, autoRecall: false, autoCapture: true)So doctor is producing a false-negative memory diagnostic while the plugin is healthy.
Environment
2026.3.31,2026.4.1,2026.4.2openclaw-mem0quarkRelevant config shape
{ "plugins": { "allow": ["telegram", "minimax", "openclaw-mem0", "google", "acpx", "browser"], "slots": { "memory": "openclaw-mem0" }, "entries": { "openclaw-mem0": { "enabled": true, "config": { "apiKey": "<present>", "userId": "quark", "autoRecall": false, "autoCapture": true } } } } }Steps to Reproduce
openclaw-mem0as the active memory plugin viaplugins.slots.memory.Actual Behavior
doctorsays no active memory plugin is registered.At the same time,
openclaw mem0 statsreturns valid plugin stats, for example:Expected Behavior
If
openclaw-mem0is loaded, configured inplugins.slots.memory, and answering successfully viaopenclaw mem0 stats,doctorshould not claim that no active memory plugin is registered.At minimum, the diagnostic should distinguish between:
Impact
This is misleading enough to trigger unnecessary incident response after upgrades. In our case, memory was verified working end-to-end (including storing + searching a new memory), but
doctorstill implied the memory lane was broken.That makes health reporting harder to trust, especially during upgrade validation.