Summary
On OpenClaw 2026.2.26, memory_search returns empty results for newly added memory text even after successful forced reindex.
Evidence shows the new text is present in the memory DB (chunks table), so ingestion/indexing succeeded but retrieval does not surface it.
Steps to reproduce
- Add unique canary text to
workspace/memory/2026-02-27.md, e.g.:
you know you need unique New York
hey that’s my car
qzv91-lime-orbit
- Run:
openclaw memory index --force
- Verify status:
openclaw memory status --json
Indexed counts increased (observed 20/38 -> 21/40).
- Query:
memory_search("you know you need unique New York")
memory_search("hey that's my car")
memory_search("qzv91-lime-orbit")
Expected behavior
Exact/near-exact canary queries should return the newly indexed chunk(s), including path/line references.
Actual behavior
All canary queries return results: [].
OpenClaw version
2026.2.26
Operating system
macOS 15.7.4 (x64)
Install method
nom global
Logs, screenshots, and evidence
### Relevant config
{
"agents": {
"defaults": {
"memorySearch": {
"provider": "local",
"fallback": "none",
"model": "hf:ggml-org/embeddinggemma-300m-qat-q8_0-GGUF/embeddinggemma-300m-qat-Q8_0.gguf",
"sync": { "watch": true }
}
}
}
}
### Additional evidence
SQLite confirms canary text exists in indexed chunks:
sqlite3 ~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite \
"select path,start_line,end_line from chunks where text like '%qzv91-lime-orbit%';"
Returns:
`memory/2026-02-27.md|1|7`
So indexing/ingestion succeeded; retrieval path appears to drop or fail to surface matching chunks.
### Minimal Repro Commands
# 1) add canary to memory file
echo '- canary: qzv91-lime-orbit' >> ~/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-02-27.md
# 2) force reindex
openclaw memory index --force
# 3) verify index counts/provider
openclaw memory status --json
# 4) search (returns empty unexpectedly)
openclaw memory search --query "qzv91-lime-orbit"
# 5) DB proof chunk exists
sqlite3 ~/.openclaw/memory/main.sqlite \
"select path,start_line,end_line from chunks where text like '%qzv91-lime-orbit%';"
Impact and severity
Affected: assume everybody who hasn't self-patched
Severity: very concerning
Frequency: always
Consequences: forgetfulness, poor decision making, escape guardrails, etc.
Additional information
MC-023-openclaw-memory-search-bug-report.md
Why this matters
This is a silent recall reliability failure: memory appears healthy (vector/fts ready, index updated) but fresh memory cannot be retrieved.
Potential relation
May be related to prior retrieval/hybrid regressions:
Summary
On OpenClaw
2026.2.26,memory_searchreturns empty results for newly added memory text even after successful forced reindex.Evidence shows the new text is present in the memory DB (
chunkstable), so ingestion/indexing succeeded but retrieval does not surface it.Steps to reproduce
workspace/memory/2026-02-27.md, e.g.:you know you need unique New Yorkhey that’s my carqzv91-lime-orbit20/38 -> 21/40).memory_search("you know you need unique New York")memory_search("hey that's my car")memory_search("qzv91-lime-orbit")Expected behavior
Exact/near-exact canary queries should return the newly indexed chunk(s), including path/line references.
Actual behavior
All canary queries return
results: [].OpenClaw version
2026.2.26
Operating system
macOS 15.7.4 (x64)
Install method
nom global
Logs, screenshots, and evidence
Impact and severity
Affected: assume everybody who hasn't self-patched
Severity: very concerning
Frequency: always
Consequences: forgetfulness, poor decision making, escape guardrails, etc.
Additional information
MC-023-openclaw-memory-search-bug-report.md
Why this matters
This is a silent recall reliability failure: memory appears healthy (vector/fts ready, index updated) but fresh memory cannot be retrieved.
Potential relation
May be related to prior retrieval/hybrid regressions: