What version of Codex CLI is running?
codex-cli 0.120.0
What subscription do you have?
Pro
Which model were you using?
No response
What platform is your computer?
No response
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
No response
What issue are you seeing?
If you start a message to codex with a valid command i.e. /babysit-pr it fails with "Unrecognized command"
So you have to add a token in front like, "use" when really that should not be necessary.
Sometimes, I specifically want to start a sentence with a skill like,/test this new feature, which is like a rather large verb behind that but the AI will absolutely get it once it processes the skill.
However, this is not allowed...for seemingly historical reasons when commands and skills had to be treated 100% differently.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Create a valid skill, invoke it in the middle of a sentence. Do it again at the start. it fails.
What is the expected behavior?
It simply processes the skill as it otherwise would.
Additional information
No response
What version of Codex CLI is running?
codex-cli 0.120.0
What subscription do you have?
Pro
Which model were you using?
No response
What platform is your computer?
No response
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
No response
What issue are you seeing?
If you start a message to codex with a valid command i.e.
/babysit-prit fails with "Unrecognized command"So you have to add a token in front like, "use" when really that should not be necessary.
Sometimes, I specifically want to start a sentence with a skill like,
/test this new feature, which is like a rather large verb behind that but the AI will absolutely get it once it processes the skill.However, this is not allowed...for seemingly historical reasons when commands and skills had to be treated 100% differently.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Create a valid skill, invoke it in the middle of a sentence. Do it again at the start. it fails.
What is the expected behavior?
It simply processes the skill as it otherwise would.
Additional information
No response