Conversation
|
The PR looks good. I'm a bit hesitant about this feature, because I don't see the benefit of using a single column over multiple columns. Can you describe your use case? Is it that your single AP column might contain many different annotation properties? |
|
I'm still having trouble seeing the use case for this, but I'm not opposed to it. Can you please complete the documentation for this feature in |
|
I'd like to see this capability added. We use dozens of annotation properties for curation and domain specific descriptions but an individual term is likely to use only a small number (but necessarily the same ones in a batch). Putting both the property and literal into a single pipe-separated field keeps us from maintaining very wide but sparse spreadsheets and we don't have to change the template when we add new annotation properties. |
|
Thanks @dlutz2. Have you used or tested this PR? |
|
We've been using the multi-annotation capability in production since it was proposed. Been working fine. |
|
I made some changes and generalizations to this in #1249 Please take a look. |
Resolves [#ISSUE, resolves #ISSUE]
docs/have been added/updatedmvn verifysays all tests passmvn sitesays all JavaDocs correctCHANGELOG.mdhas been updated[DESCRIPTION, mentioning relevant #ISSUE]