Skip to content

Multi annotation column#1205

Closed
pk-mitre wants to merge 3 commits intoontodev:masterfrom
pk-mitre:multi-annotation-column
Closed

Multi annotation column#1205
pk-mitre wants to merge 3 commits intoontodev:masterfrom
pk-mitre:multi-annotation-column

Conversation

@pk-mitre
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves [#ISSUE, resolves #ISSUE]

  • docs/ have been added/updated
  • tests have been added/updated
  • mvn verify says all tests pass
  • mvn site says all JavaDocs correct
  • CHANGELOG.md has been updated

[DESCRIPTION, mentioning relevant #ISSUE]

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Member

The PR looks good. I'm a bit hesitant about this feature, because I don't see the benefit of using a single column over multiple columns. Can you describe your use case? Is it that your single AP column might contain many different annotation properties?

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Member

I'm still having trouble seeing the use case for this, but I'm not opposed to it. Can you please complete the documentation for this feature in template.md?

@dlutz2
Copy link

dlutz2 commented Jan 19, 2025

I'd like to see this capability added. We use dozens of annotation properties for curation and domain specific descriptions but an individual term is likely to use only a small number (but necessarily the same ones in a batch). Putting both the property and literal into a single pipe-separated field keeps us from maintaining very wide but sparse spreadsheets and we don't have to change the template when we add new annotation properties.

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Member

Thanks @dlutz2. Have you used or tested this PR?

@dlutz2
Copy link

dlutz2 commented Jan 23, 2025

We've been using the multi-annotation capability in production since it was proposed. Been working fine.

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Member

jamesaoverton commented Mar 7, 2025

I made some changes and generalizations to this in #1249 Please take a look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants