Skip to content

fix: add banner and other important stuff#60

Merged
oleg-koval merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/release-4
May 2, 2026
Merged

fix: add banner and other important stuff#60
oleg-koval merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/release-4

Conversation

@oleg-koval
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Provide a short, high-level overview of what this PR changes (two sentences max).
  • Highlight which primary CLI flows, commands, or configuration paths the change touches.

Problem

  • Describe the user-facing or internal pain point you are addressing.
  • If the change fixes a bug, summarize the incorrect behavior or confusing output.

Solution

  • Outline how you solved the problem. Mention key packages, commands, or scripts that changed.
  • Call out notable updates to configuration, Docker handling, or release hooks.

Scope

  • List the affected subcommands, modules, or documentation areas (e.g., dcli docker clean, internal/git).
  • Indicate whether the change is limited to docs/tests, a single command, or spans multiple helpers.

Type of change

  • feat (new capability)
  • fix (bug fix)
  • docs (documentation only)
  • test (adds or changes tests)
  • chore (maintenance, tooling, CI)
  • other (describe in Summary)

Related issues

  • Link the main issue(s) this PR addresses (e.g., Closes #123). Mention other relevant discussions if any.

Validation

  • List commands you ran locally (e.g., make test, go test ./..., bin/dcli docker clean --dry-run).
  • Include links or filenames for logs if the validation spanned multiple platforms.

Screenshots / Demo

  • Paste representative terminal output, logs, or command snippets showing the new behavior.
  • If nothing visual changed, note N/A (screenshots are rare for CLI, but logs show the runtime effect).

Risk and impact

  • Describe deployment concerns (extra permissions, config migrations, update checks, etc.).
  • Call out performance, platform, or compatibility risks for Docker Compose and Git workflows.

Breaking changes

  • Explain any backward-incompatible behavior, config file changes, or new required flags.
  • If nothing breaks, write None.

Documentation

  • Note which docs/test plans were updated (e.g., docs/CONFIGURATION.md, TESTING_README.md).
  • Mention if you updated the README, CONtributing guide, or release notes.

Reviewer notes

  • Highlight manual verification steps, simplifications, or follow-up cleanup that reviewers should know.
  • Mention specific areas requiring additional scrutiny (self-updates, CI badges, config parsing).

Checklist

  • Tests pass locally (make test, go test ./..., etc.)
  • No additional lint or vet warnings in go test output
  • Documentation or docs site updated if behavior changed (e.g., docs/, README.md)
  • Changelog/Release notes entry added if the change ships in a release

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@oleg-koval has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 23a2f2ca-4209-433f-a4fb-dabfcc7d466c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91a001a and 5a8a692.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • assets/banner.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/FUNDING.yml
  • .github/workflows/greetings.yml
  • README.md
  • index.html
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/release-4

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 28 minutes and 50 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Summary by Qodo

Add author attribution and funding links to documentation

📝 Documentation

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Add author attribution and website links to footer
• Include Buy Me a Coffee support link in multiple locations
• Create GitHub FUNDING.yml configuration file
• Update README with website and support links
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["Documentation Files"] -- "Add attribution" --> B["index.html footer"]
  A -- "Add website link" --> C["README.md"]
  A -- "Add support link" --> D["Buy Me a Coffee"]
  E["GitHub Config"] -- "Create funding config" --> F[".github/FUNDING.yml"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. index.html 📝 Documentation +8/-0

Add footer attribution and support links

• Added new paragraph with author attribution to @oleg-koval
• Added link to dcli.olegkoval.com website
• Added Buy Me a Coffee support link

index.html


2. .github/FUNDING.yml ⚙️ Configuration changes +2/-0

Create GitHub funding configuration

• Created new GitHub FUNDING configuration file
• Added Buy Me a Coffee custom funding link

.github/FUNDING.yml


3. README.md 📝 Documentation +4/-1

Add website and support links to README

• Added website link (dcli.olegkoval.com) after author attribution
• Added Buy Me a Coffee link to footer call-to-action section
• Updated footer navigation with support link

README.md


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

qodo-code-review Bot commented May 2, 2026

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

Input parameters use snake_case (repo_token, issue_message, pr_message), not kebab-case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@oleg-koval oleg-koval merged commit f342914 into main May 2, 2026
7 checks passed
@oleg-koval oleg-koval deleted the fix/release-4 branch May 2, 2026 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant