Merged
Conversation
595cce7 to
bb77384
Compare
ernado
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the features that I really miss is an ability to add custom validation on the schema-level. I would like to use CEL validation language to describe more complex rules for my schema.
Enforcing CEL into ogen is probably too much, so I suggest to add a new x-ogen-validate extension to allow registering custom validators.
I understand from examples that extra tags is one way of doing it.
However, this doesn't allow to register validation on a request struct level, which I think is very useful for writing powerful validations.