Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
Mmh according to all this fancy CI that was maybe not a got idea… I'll try to converse to see how it goes. |
We move it from test/cases to src/ocamlary and declare it as a virtual library. The initial test case file becomes a symlink to the library.
Contributor
Author
|
I don't understand this That exits with |
The main changes are suppression of generic references and outdated markup constructs.
Contributor
Author
|
Ah ! It does error after a So I tweaked the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On popular request, brings back the
ocamlarylibrary and installs it asodoc.ocamlary.It seems that the source that was in the test/inactive/core inactive library had slightly diverged from the one inSee commit comment.test/cases. I kept the former since a manual inspection seemed to indicate it had a few more test cases (also the former had the implementation)Closes #630.