Skip to content

fix bad behaviour of caml_alloc_custom_mem (4.14)#12322

Open
damiendoligez wants to merge 1 commit intoocaml:4.14from
damiendoligez:fix-caml-alloc-custom-mem-414
Open

fix bad behaviour of caml_alloc_custom_mem (4.14)#12322
damiendoligez wants to merge 1 commit intoocaml:4.14from
damiendoligez:fix-caml-alloc-custom-mem-414

Conversation

@damiendoligez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is the backport of #12318 to 4.14.

@damiendoligez damiendoligez changed the title change the meaning of custom_minor_max_size fix bad behaviour of caml_alloc_custom_mem (4.14) Jul 12, 2023
@damiendoligez damiendoligez marked this pull request as draft October 17, 2023 14:43
@damiendoligez damiendoligez force-pushed the fix-caml-alloc-custom-mem-414 branch from 7379958 to 4aa224d Compare November 21, 2023 16:48
@damiendoligez damiendoligez force-pushed the fix-caml-alloc-custom-mem-414 branch from 4aa224d to 5d1e983 Compare November 21, 2023 16:53
@damiendoligez damiendoligez marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2023 16:53
@damiendoligez damiendoligez added this to the 4.14.2 milestone Nov 21, 2023
@Octachron Octachron self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@gasche
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

gasche commented Feb 7, 2024

The code looks fine to me. The question is whether the benefits of fixing bad behaviors on 4.14 is worth the risk of fixing accidentally-desirable behaviors in 4.14. I think we should try on a Bigarray program to reassure ourselves before making a merge decision.

@damiendoligez damiendoligez modified the milestones: 4.14.2, 4.14.3 Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants