Skip to content

[incremental cycles] Abstract vertex set type#3081

Closed
ejgallego wants to merge 2 commits intoocaml:masterfrom
ejgallego:intf_vertexset
Closed

[incremental cycles] Abstract vertex set type#3081
ejgallego wants to merge 2 commits intoocaml:masterfrom
ejgallego:intf_vertexset

Conversation

@ejgallego
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

After discussion in #2959 , we abstract the vertex set representation in incremental cycles.

cc: @Armael

I used `Result.t` type, not sure this is the right choice.

The implementation is a bit quite hackish for the `Map` case, maybe it
should be upstreamed into OCaml; suggestions welcome.

Signed-off-by: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <e+git@x80.org>
@ejgallego ejgallego force-pushed the intf_vertexset branch 2 times, most recently from cf5aca7 to c0fe8cc Compare February 4, 2020 22:43
This way clients can provide their own iterator.

Signed-off-by: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <e+git@x80.org>
@ejgallego
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

ejgallego commented Feb 6, 2020

I'm going to close this for now; given that the solution in #2959 doesn't finally need a change of API.

If upstream wants to tweak the API more we can just indeed follow up in their repos.

@ejgallego ejgallego closed this Feb 6, 2020
@ejgallego ejgallego deleted the intf_vertexset branch February 6, 2020 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant