Revert no longer classify (rich) edit classes as bad for UIA#15381
Merged
Conversation
6 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to issue number:
Reintroduces #14285
Fixes #15375
Fixes #15330
Reverts #15314
Summary of the issue:
In #15314, edit and rich edit classes were no longer classified as bad for UIA. This caused the following issues:
Generally spoken, removing these classes from the bad UIA classes list meant an API breaking change because Edit objects using UIA instead of legacy Edit support behave differently with regard to overriding and filtering texts, including LTR and RTL marks.
Description of user facing changes
Reverted #15314. Most notably, the lag as reported in #14285 will unfortunately be reintroduced for now.
Description of development approach
Testing strategy:
Tested str from #15375 and #15330
Known issues with pull request:
None known
Change log entries:
In pr
Code Review Checklist: