It'd be great to include this PR into 2021.3 if possible.

In this release the back translation in Russian uncontracted braille was added. Can you, please, remove input=False in 'ru-litbrl.ctb' and 'ru-litbrl-detailed.utb'? Now the only forward translation is relevant only for 'ru-ru-g1.ctb'.
Another thing is that in the change log you've mentioned 'Russian grade 2', but it's 'Russian grade 1'.
Thanks :)

In this release the back translation in Russian uncontracted braille was added. Can you, please, remove input=False in 'ru-litbrl.ctb' and 'ru-litbrl-detailed.utb'? Now the only forward translation is relevant only for 'ru-ru-g1.ctb'.

Thanks! I had forgotten about it.

Another thing is that in the change log you've mentioned 'Russian grade 2', but it's 'Russian grade 1'.
Thanks :)

Also done. But something is bugging me:
The display-name is "Russian contracted braille".
And the first line of the file is "liblouis: Russian literary (grade 1)"
Should this table be considered contracted (g2) or literary (g1)?
Thanks again!

Should this table be considered contracted (g2) or literary (g1)?

It doesn't work like in English braille, for example. As the contracted braille isn't used in Russia oficially, we don't call literary braille "uncontracted" (a lot of people won't understand it). But the system of contracted braille was developed and now consists of two grades: grade 1 (partial contraction which includes syllables, prepositions, etc. and grade 2 which includes full words).
Thus, uncontracted braille may be called "grade 0", but such name isn't recommended.

@Futyn-Maker Thank for clarifying! Maybe should we add " (partial)" to the display-name (in NVDA)?

@AAClause maybe later, if the grade 2 table will be made.

NVDA uses "grade 0" in English to refer to uncontracted German Braille. For consistency, I think "grade 0" is appropriate.

Maybe this is acceptable for English names of these tables, but then these names shouldn't be translated on Russian like "нулевая ступень" (grade 0) as it can result in confusions for users.
Anyway, don't recommend change them at all.

NVDA uses "grade 0" in English to refer to uncontracted German Braille. For consistency, I think "grade 0" is appropriate.

It does so only because German braille standard refers to uncontracted Braille as grade 0. Regardless of that I don't think consistency should be a factor here. When naming LibLouis tables we should remain as close to names used in LibLouis because we're not familiar with particular Braille codes being implemented, and since someone named these tables in a particular way they presumably did so in accordance with the local Braille jargon which in turn ensures that for users of these tables they can tell from the name what notation the given table implements.

@michaelDCurran Are you planning to review this in time for 2021.3?

• PASS: Translation comments check.
• PASS: Unit tests.
• PASS: Lint check.
• FAIL: System tests. See test results for more information.
• Build (for testing PR): https://ci.appveyor.com/api/buildjobs/gdjyj2wpnu4ki6df/artifacts/output/nvda_snapshot_pr12810-23787,be76e20d.exe

See test results for failed build of commit be76e20d12