@otieno-juma Compared to your example code for #26827, I had a much harder time parsing this example code. I think it is because you do not assign the results of the reshape to a variable and then explicitly have that variable print out. That is, your examples looks like:

    >>> a = np.ma.array([1, 2, 3, 4])
    >>> np.ma.reshape(a, (2, 2))
    masked_array(
      data=[[1, 2],
            [3, 4]],
      mask=False,
      fill_value=999999)

and I think they would be easier to understand if they looked like:

    >>> a = np.ma.array([1, 2, 3, 4])
    >>> x = np.ma.reshape(a, (2, 2))
    >>> x
    masked_array(
      data=[[1, 2],
            [3, 4]],
      mask=False,
      fill_value=999999)

Thank you very much, @eagunn, for the feedback. We will improve our prompts to enhance those edges.

Converting to draft pending review of the first such PR: gh-26827.

@otieno-juma Could you rebase this and the other pending PRs?

@bmwoodruff, All the checks have passed. could you please review it?

I ran the tests locally on my machine. Looks good. @charris, this should be ready for you to review. @otieno-juma , you can remove the draft status.

Thanks @otieno-juma . Was there a response to @eagunn ? I didn't have a problem parsing the result, just wondering.