Skip to content

Conditions should not be optional for CBD types#80

Merged
piotr-roslaniec merged 3 commits intonucypher:mainfrom
derekpierre:not-optional
Sep 6, 2023
Merged

Conditions should not be optional for CBD types#80
piotr-roslaniec merged 3 commits intonucypher:mainfrom
derekpierre:not-optional

Conversation

@derekpierre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@derekpierre derekpierre commented Aug 30, 2023

…ata and AccessControlPolicy.

Type of PR:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Documentation
  • Other

Required reviews:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

What this does:

High-level idea of the changes introduced in this PR.
List relevant API changes (if any), as well as related PRs and issues.

Issues fixed/closed:
Related to #76 .

Why it's needed:
Conditions should not be optional for CBD - it's kind of the whole point.

Notes for reviewers:

What should reviewers focus on?
Is there a particular commit/function/section of your PR that requires more attention from reviewers?

Already ran parts of the test suite locally with nucypher to test python bindings. There are no downstream changes necessary for nucypher other than an updated nucypher-core dependency, because conditions were not optional for CBD functionality in nucypher anyway.

@derekpierre derekpierre self-assigned this Aug 30, 2023
@derekpierre derekpierre marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2023 19:13
@derekpierre derekpierre changed the title Conditions should not be optional for CBD objects Conditions should not be optional for CBD types Aug 30, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@manumonti manumonti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have a good Rust background, but LGTM 👌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Completed

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants