> Do you have a preference for consistency? If it's the namepacing that matters most to you perhaps we make a typing module per contract?

I think some sort of more direct association between the types defined and the contracts would make them more intuitive. Having them live in nucypher/types.py just seems vague; it could be a typing module per contract or even keeping it general like nucypher.blockchain.eth.types...?
 
@derekpierre derekpierre 2 days ago Member
^ BTW Doesn't have to be this PR - maybe the namespacing can be looked into as part of a separate PR.