Skip to content

fix: update timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds#327

Merged
priteshbandi merged 1 commit intonotaryproject:mainfrom
priteshbandi:main
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

fix: update timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds#327
priteshbandi merged 1 commit intonotaryproject:mainfrom
priteshbandi:main

Conversation

@priteshbandi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@priteshbandi priteshbandi commented Jun 26, 2023

updated timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds.

Updates based on updates in notaryproject/specifications#249

Signed-off-by: Pritesh Bandi <priteshbandi@gmail.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #327 (674dbb3) into main (983e97d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #327   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.80%   74.80%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        2203     2203           
=======================================
  Hits         1648     1648           
  Misses        437      437           
  Partials      118      118           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
verifier/verifier.go 81.53% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gokarnm gokarnm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT changed the title updated timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds fix: update timeout for OCSP call to 2 seconds Jun 27, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Should we merge this PR after merging notaryproject/specifications#249?

@yizha1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

yizha1 commented Jun 27, 2023

Agree with @shizhMSFT , we need to merge the spec first, then the implementation changes.

@priteshbandi priteshbandi merged commit 432c931 into notaryproject:main Jun 28, 2023
@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2023
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants