Skip to content

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Dec 19, 2024

This PR backports changes related to crl cache from main to release-1.3 branch.

PRs that's backporting:

This PR targets release-1.3 branch.

Patrick Zheng and others added 3 commits December 19, 2024 10:14
Signed-off-by: Patrick Zheng <patrickzheng@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Zheng <patrickzheng@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Zheng <patrickzheng@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Zheng <patrickzheng@microsoft.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.72%. Comparing base (141bdf1) to head (277311d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release-1.3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-1.3    #1117      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        70.35%   70.72%   +0.37%     
===============================================
  Files               46       47       +1     
  Lines             2911     2948      +37     
===============================================
+ Hits              2048     2085      +37     
  Misses             670      670              
  Partials           193      193              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JeyJeyGao
Copy link
Contributor

JeyJeyGao commented Dec 19, 2024

It looks like this PR includes #1076, #1078, and #1079.

For #1079, which is the test for the entire CRL feature and not limited to the cache, should we update the PR name to:

backport: CRL cache and CRL E2E test from main to release-1.3 branch

Also, please mention the PRs that we are backporting in the PR description. Thanks! @Two-Hearts

@ghost ghost changed the title backport: crl cache from main to release-1.3 branch backport: crl from main to release-1.3 branch Dec 19, 2024
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 19, 2024

It looks like this PR includes #1076, #1078, and #1079.

For #1079, which is the test for the entire CRL feature and not limited to the cache, should we update the PR name to:

backport: CRL cache and CRL E2E test from main to release-1.3 branch

Also, please mention the PRs that we are backporting in the PR description. Thanks! @Two-Hearts

@JeyJeyGao Updated.

Copy link
Contributor

@JeyJeyGao JeyJeyGao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@JeyJeyGao
Copy link
Contributor

Is it expected that the test/e2e/go.mod bump is also included in this PR?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 19, 2024

Is it expected that the test/e2e/go.mod bump is also included in this PR?

It was brought in by PR: #1079.

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT changed the title backport: crl from main to release-1.3 branch backport: CRL cache from main to release-1.3 Dec 19, 2024
@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT changed the title backport: CRL cache from main to release-1.3 backport: CRL changes from main to release-1.3 Dec 19, 2024
@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT changed the title backport: CRL changes from main to release-1.3 backport: CRL with log and E2E tests from main to release-1.3 Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shizhMSFT shizhMSFT changed the title backport: CRL with log and E2E tests from main to release-1.3 backport: CRL cache with log and E2E tests from main to release-1.3 Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@vaninrao10 vaninrao10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ghost ghost merged commit 8c20002 into notaryproject:release-1.3 Dec 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@ghost ghost deleted the crl branch December 20, 2024 00:03
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2024
6 tasks
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants