Conversation
|
Cool, I like it |
|
Concept ACK. ACK to 'git authors'. Would / should clients label the git repository follow list as starred repositories? I think may git clients will want to inherit the 'starred' concept from github but I admit there is an overlap with reactions, zaps and a repository follow list. In nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpgqgmmc409hm4xsdd74sf68a2uyf9pwel4g9mfdg8l5244t6x4jdqqs9ydqwez3x2k3e5rk8tmjkumg5zgf6xf8054zudfru0m9cc0p6slsf4n332 I proposed we should add a Git repository 'set' with a default In any case we should definately add git repositories as a set. BudaBit is using lists for git repositories. @chebizarro what structure do you use? |
|
Partial reply here: nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqwlsccluhy6xxsr6l9a9uhhxf75g85g8a709tprjcn4e42h053vaqythwumn8ghj7cnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uqzpdjk8pqu62fr7qmerq8v2j43vknykspsmf63dsfyt7n8znzdnk58zccgfa |
@dluvian @DanConwayDev @TheAwiteb what do you think?