The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Followup Todos for us:

• Add example repo (nextauthjs/nuxt-example-app)
• Ensure Balazs github token can write to that (for sync)
• Double check example code sync to that new repo
• Add nuxt example app Vercel project (with shared env vars)
• Add nuxt.authjs.dev subdomain

is it possible to build it and use it as alpha until the production version released ? @peterbud

is it possible to build it and use it as alpha until the production version released ? @peterbud

I think we are pretty early in the process of creating this framework, I'd love to have a proper review from the AuthJS core members before suggesting to use this.

@peterbud is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

View full report↗︎

Okay gotcha, I'll revert that then. Unfortunately the auto-detect env vars from @auth/core wont work then without additional changes there, but that's okay for now imo

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@auth/solid-start@0.13.0, npm/@aws-sdk/client-dynamodb@3.499.0, npm/@aws-sdk/lib-dynamodb@3.499.0, npm/@cloudflare/workers-types@4.20240117.0, npm/@solidjs/meta@0.28.7, npm/@solidjs/router@0.6.0, npm/autoprefixer@10.4.20, npm/postcss@8.4.44, npm/solid-js@1.8.22, npm/solid-start-node@0.2.32, npm/solid-start-vercel@0.2.32, npm/solid-start@0.2.32, npm/tailwindcss@3.4.10, npm/typescript@5.2.2, npm/vite@3.2.10, npm/vite@5.3.1, npm/zod@3.23.8

View full report↗︎

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.17%. Comparing base (a1cf406) to head (227440a).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10684       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   39.15%   77.17%   +38.02%     
===========================================
  Files         191      114       -77     
  Lines       29988     2936    -27052     
  Branches     1291      385      -906     
===========================================
- Hits        11742     2266     -9476     
+ Misses      18246      670    -17576     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

i noticed next-auth changed in v5. will this be v5 compatible ? will this be offical nuxt or community ?

kudos @peterbud for sticking with it all this time.

i noticed next-auth changed in v5. will this be v5 compatible ?

v5 compatible

I'm not sure what else would be needed to move forward with this PR.

It has been open for more than 6 months, and recently I looked optimistic in the future as we finally managed to get the reviews completed with the help of the core team.

In the last 2 weeks this PR seems to be stalled again, and it's again drifting from the main branch.

Could you please answer the question honestly and make a decision on whether there is more effort to be done into this PR (and what that would be), or make the decision to cancel this PR. At this point I think canceling this PR is probably more respectful to each others time and energy.

Would love to see this merged in

@ThangHuuVu can this please be merged? Thanks!

not sure why "authjs" has been ignoring nuxt. it is the closest the next. in this time, a lot of devs (myself included) turned to nuxt-auth-utils as the alternative. @peterbud i appreciate your efforts regardless of the outcome.

Agree @peterbud thank you so much!

Starting to think that they are waiting approval from next/vercel (jokes aside)!

not sure why "authjs" has been ignoring nuxt. it is the closest the next. in this time, a lot of devs (myself included) turned to nuxt-auth-utils as the alternative

I agree. I think I have to let this go.

@peterbud really appreciate all the effort. Really such a disgrace of the team!

Agree thanks @peterbud ! Based on how this was handled I moved to better-auth. Works superbly.

Hi @peterbud 👋

I’ve been following the progress of this PR and was really excited to see where it was heading. You’ve done an amazing job with the integration, and it’s honestly a bit sad to see the PR closed.

I work on a Nuxt 3 module for NextAuth called @sidebase/nuxt-auth, and we’ve tried several times to update it to work with AuthJS. Unfortunately, we've run into some stability issues along the way.

Seeing how much progress you’ve made, I wanted to reach out and see if you'd be interested in helping us tackle some of the issues we’ve faced with the upgrade. It would be awesome to release a Nuxt 3 integration of AuthJS for the community!

If you're interested, feel free to DM me on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/zoeykaiser.com

Hi @zoey-kaiser,

Thank you so much for your kind words and for following the progress of the PR. I truly appreciate your support and enthusiasm.

I understand the challenges you've faced with updating your Nuxt 3 module to work with AuthJS. However, at this time, I must politely decline your request for assistance. The future of AuthJS seems uncertain, and the maintainers appear to be somewhat disconnected, which makes it difficult to commit to this integration.

I wish you the best of luck with your project and hope you find a suitable solution soon.

This is critical for our use case. We’d love to see this merged please let us know if we can help with testing or resolving any blockers!

@AdnanCukur don't waste your time. The team were rude and unhelpful tk @peterbud who put in the effort. This has fallen way behind. Rather use something like better auth

that work nice with some tweaks, https://authjs-nuxt.pages.dev/getting-started