Has connection with #1063 and #966
@devhawk has already commented that NGD Seattle was working on tools for running the NEO blockchain only using local memory (if client is killed everything needs to be resynced), which is also an direction we have for micro-controllers and the IoT applications we used to work on here in Brazil.
I believe that this is a good direction for designing the use of storage with basic functions.
Then, instead of switching from LevelDB to RocksDB we would make it more flexible for just running on the local memory and then try to design a flexible scheme for switching DBs upon nodes runner choices.
Has connection with #1063 and #966
@devhawk has already commented that NGD Seattle was working on tools for running the NEO blockchain only using local memory (if client is killed everything needs to be resynced), which is also an direction we have for micro-controllers and the IoT applications we used to work on here in Brazil.
I believe that this is a good direction for designing the use of storage with basic functions.
Then, instead of switching from LevelDB to RocksDB we would make it more flexible for just running on the local memory and then try to design a flexible scheme for switching DBs upon nodes runner choices.