Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 42.85714% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.65%. Comparing base (bd4bc99) to head (8874785).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2755   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.65%   74.65%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines       11139    11147    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits         8316     8322    +6     
- Misses       2186     2190    +4     
+ Partials      637      635    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I mean, I'd rather act use `...` instead of '...', but that's a larger discussion and yes, some extra quoting adventures would be involved.

This PR is just for general English readability and consistency.

Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (42.85%) is below the target coverage (50.00%)

I do not think we can run old and new actions cache tests in nektos/act (would double the test duration), so coverage is a problem....

my own version has removed the old actions cache, like I planned for nektos/act and has much better coverage for these Line of Code. We would need help from cplee to bypass this check.

I'd rather remove Codecov (or disable CI failure for it), I know it feels nice that numbers go up for good things but we are not a corporation that has to deliver certain quality, just few people trying to make things better. It would be better if it just reported coverage without killing contributions.