Skip to content

[ISSUE #1219]📝Update README.md#1220

Merged
rocketmq-rust-bot merged 1 commit intomainfrom
doc-1219
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #1219]📝Update README.md#1220
rocketmq-rust-bot merged 1 commit intomainfrom
doc-1219

Conversation

@mxsm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 18, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1219

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a roadmap section in the README, outlining the release schedule for upcoming versions.
    • Specified a quarterly release cadence with details on future versions up to v0.9.0.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced clarity on the project's future direction and version management in the README.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The README.md file for the RocketMQ-Rust project has been updated to include a new roadmap section that outlines the release schedule for upcoming versions. This section details a quarterly release cadence, listing the first three versions as released and indicating future versions up to v0.9.0, with remarks on their status. The overall structure of the document remains unchanged, retaining sections on features, getting started, modules, contributing, and licensing.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a new roadmap section detailing version releases and status.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update README.md

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

approved, auto merge

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A roadmap shines, dispelling gloom.
With versions planned, we hop along,
To future releases, we sing our song!
Let's guide our project, bright and clear,
With every update, we draw near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 17.54%. Comparing base (df10f9a) to head (3b4be74).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1220   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   17.54%   17.54%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       53010    53010           
=======================================
  Hits         9301     9301           
  Misses      43709    43709           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

27-28: Consider rephrasing the roadmap introduction for clarity and professionalism.

The current wording focuses on bug fixes, which might undersell the value of regular releases. Consider rephrasing to emphasize feature development and project progress.

-🔊Release a new version every three months to fix issues. If there are major updates or new features, additional releases will be scheduled🍻. 
+We maintain a quarterly release schedule for version updates, including bug fixes and improvements. Additional releases may be scheduled for significant features or updates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~27-~27: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...ase a new version every three months to fix issues. If there are major updates or n...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df10f9a and 3b4be74.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~27-~27: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...ase a new version every three months to fix issues. If there are major updates or n...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

29-41: Review and adjust the release schedule for consistency.

The current release schedule shows some inconsistencies:

  1. The spacing between releases (v0.1.0 to v0.3.0) doesn't follow the stated quarterly pattern.
  2. Planning versions up to 2026 might be overly optimistic and could become outdated quickly.

Consider:

  1. Adjusting the release dates to reflect actual quarterly intervals
  2. Limiting the roadmap to a shorter timeframe (e.g., 1 year) for more realistic planning
  3. Removing the "..." row as it's redundant given the stated release pattern

Let's verify the stated release dates of past versions:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update README.md

3 participants