Fix DMI Neumann boundary conditions for non-3D simulations#363
Merged
JonathanMaes merged 3 commits into3.11from Apr 3, 2025
Merged
Fix DMI Neumann boundary conditions for non-3D simulations#363JonathanMaes merged 3 commits into3.11from
JonathanMaes merged 3 commits into3.11from
Conversation
JonathanMaes
reviewed
Apr 2, 2025
This was referenced Apr 3, 2025
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should fix issue #352. Calculation of the effective magnetic field of bulk DMI was skipped when there was no derivative to be taken in the z-direction, but the Neumann boundary conditions do not cancel out. Open BC can still be skipped, and for interfacial DMI this is not a problem.
I also added a test to confirm the expected symmetry.