I'm seeing misbehavior where an enum in a module causes mistranslation of a struct containing a #[repr(u32)] enum with the same name.

Here's a very simple test case:
test.rs:

mod uhoh {
    enum BindingType { Buffer, NotBuffer }
}

#[repr(u32)]
pub enum BindingType { Buffer = 0, NotBuffer = 1 }

#[repr(C)]
pub struct BindGroupLayoutEntry {
    pub ty: BindingType, // This is the repr(u32) enum
}

cbindgen.toml

language = "C"

[export]
include = [
    "BindGroupLayoutEntry",
]

Running cbindgen 0.16.0:

$ cbindgen -c cbindgen.toml test.rs
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

enum BindingType {
  Buffer = 0,
  NotBuffer = 1,
};
typedef uint32_t BindingType;

typedef struct BindGroupLayoutEntry {
  struct BindingType ty;
} BindGroupLayoutEntry;

Having the member be struct BindingType ty is invalid, because there is no struct BindingType in the header; it should instead be BindingType ty.