@ekg - better still, make a Makefile. I was going to make one. But I think a Makefile for the sample is a better idea

Sure can do.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 19:03 Saurav Mohapatra notifications@github.com
wrote:

@ekg https://github.com/ekg - better still, make a Makefile. I was
going to make one. But I think a Makefile for the sample is a better idea

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#3 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI4EYeXvvvewDDRVand996A09Iakt7bks5qlcIFgaJpZM4JxyqJ
.

Thanks @ekg for the PR, not only needed for gcc 5.4, but for gcc 4.8, clang 3.7 etc too!
Fixes #6 for me 👍

@mohaps could you please merge this urgently?
(and leave a Makefile to a separate PR? Personally, I don't see a reason for a Makefile, as the project's aim seems to be "being a single simple header file", so it is intended to be included into existing projects only as a header and using theirs (c)make files)

Closing this as I updated the readme and the pull request for std::list implementation added the include