Conversation
|
Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just |
✅ Deploy Preview for module-federation-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Bundle Size Report8 package(s) changed, 33 unchanged.
Total dist: 6.35 MB (-379807 B (-5.4%)) |
@module-federation/devtools
@module-federation/cli
create-module-federation
@module-federation/data-prefetch
@module-federation/dts-plugin
@module-federation/enhanced
@module-federation/error-codes
@module-federation/esbuild
@module-federation/managers
@module-federation/manifest
@module-federation/metro
@module-federation/metro-plugin-rnc-cli
@module-federation/metro-plugin-rnef
@module-federation/modern-js
@module-federation/modern-js-v3
@module-federation/native-federation-tests
@module-federation/native-federation-typescript
@module-federation/nextjs-mf
@module-federation/node
@module-federation/retry-plugin
@module-federation/rsbuild-plugin
@module-federation/rspack
@module-federation/rspress-plugin
@module-federation/runtime
@module-federation/runtime-core
@module-federation/runtime-tools
@module-federation/sdk
@module-federation/storybook-addon
@module-federation/third-party-dts-extractor
@module-federation/treeshake-frontend
@module-federation/treeshake-server
@module-federation/typescript
@module-federation/utilities
@module-federation/webpack-bundler-runtime
@module-federation/bridge-react
@module-federation/bridge-react-webpack-plugin
@module-federation/bridge-shared
@module-federation/bridge-vue3
@module-federation/inject-external-runtime-core-plugin
commit: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 12153a2334
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@cursoragent review this pull request |
|
Reviewed ✅ PR review summaryI went through the current branch/PR state (including the GitHub context and recent commits), and this looks in good shape overall. What I checked
About the P1 review comment (lazy webpack-path concern)The concern appears to be addressed by follow-up commits:
Verdict
|


Summary
Complete the remaining Nx executor/plugin migration work and reduce Nx-specific surface area in favor of direct command-based targets.
What changed
project.jsonexecutor targets tonx:run-commands/CLI-driven flows where applicable.@goestav/nx-semantic-releasepaths.tsdown.tsdown.config.tsfor key packages (core,enhanced,storybook-addon,typescript,tools/rslib-plugin).Impact
Risk / verification focus
tools/rslib-plugin/distoutputs.Type of change
Related