Skip to content

Avoid confusing results in coverage reports #2639

@adpaco-aws

Description

@adpaco-aws

Requested feature: Coverage results, as reported in #2609 , include some confusing or hard-to-interpret results. We should investigate how to improve these cases. Maybe we can compare with Rust's coverage results, or make some choices based on span information.
Use case: Coverage results
Link to relevant documentation (Rust reference, Nomicon, RFC): #2612

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    [C] Feature / EnhancementA new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions