Skip to content

Remove s390x and ppc64le Jenkins pipelines#46224

Merged
thaJeztah merged 1 commit intomoby:masterfrom
sam-thibault:remove-ibm-jenkins-jobs
Aug 14, 2023
Merged

Remove s390x and ppc64le Jenkins pipelines#46224
thaJeztah merged 1 commit intomoby:masterfrom
sam-thibault:remove-ibm-jenkins-jobs

Conversation

@sam-thibault
Copy link
Contributor

@sam-thibault sam-thibault commented Aug 14, 2023

closes #42496
closes #42495
closes #42494
closes #42468
closes #23626

- What I did

Removed s390x and ppc64le Jenkins pipelines. These pipeline have been failing for an extended period of time.

- How I did it

Change is applied in Jenkinsfile. The Jenkins agents will be disabled and removed after this PR is merged.

- How to verify it

https://ci-next.docker.com/public/job/moby/

- Description for the changelog

Removed s390x and ppc64le Jenkins pipelines

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

image

@sam-thibault sam-thibault changed the title Remove s390x and ppc64ls Jenkins pipelines Remove s390x and ppc64le Jenkins pipelines Aug 14, 2023
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

We can also remove the parameters at the top;

moby/Jenkinsfile

Lines 12 to 13 in 7b28bc5

booleanParam(name: 's390x', defaultValue: false, description: 'IBM Z (s390x) Build/Test')
booleanParam(name: 'ppc64le', defaultValue: false, description: 'PowerPC (ppc64le) Build/Test')

For the "closes" ones; we should double-check if they're all really for s390x/ppc64le only, or if they also failed on other platforms (but just "more frequent" on s390x/ppc because those were running older versions of ubuntu)

@sam-thibault
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I removed the parameters at the top. I'll look into the flaky tests.

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

Can you squash the commits? 😅

Signed-off-by: Sam Thibault <sam.thibault@docker.com>
Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@neersighted PTAL

@@ -51,406 +49,6 @@ pipeline {
}
stage('Build') {
parallel {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wondering if we can remove the parallel here, and possibly run some of the remaining (arm64) stages in parallel, but we can look at that in follow-ups)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment