Conversation
|
Thanks! This patch has really come full-circle--I originally found the bug via a project I have which uses docker-py 😄 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #38524 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.62% 36.62% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 608 608
Lines 45174 45174
==========================================
- Hits 16546 16544 -2
- Misses 26339 26342 +3
+ Partials 2289 2288 -1 |
|
@LinuxMercedes 😂 that made me laugh @shin- I updated the installation to use
|
c2b4baa to
96fe572
Compare
|
Looks like |
0cacf09 to
5acebde
Compare
|
removed the changes to use |
5acebde to
96778a0
Compare
3cf2801 to
aae0255
Compare
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
aae0255 to
c0c05af
Compare
|
ok; think I have it going now. it just occurred to me that we don't even run the docker-py tests on s390x, powerpc or arm, so I actually want to do a follow-up to see if I can rewrite the Dockerfile to skip installation on those platforms. CI does not (yet) use BuildKit, so skipping build-stages is not really possible yet, but perhaps with some script hacks for the time being. |
|
Ready for merge? |
Full diff: docker/docker-py@8b246db...ac92219 / https://github.com/docker/docker-py/compare/8b246db271a85d6541dc458838627e89c683e42f..ac922192959870774ad8428344d9faa0555f7ba6
Includes docker/docker-py#2216, which fixes a test checking for an incorrect status code (found through #38487 - #38487 (comment))