Skip to content

WIP: Use windowsRS4 instead of RS1#37862

Closed
olljanat wants to merge 1 commit intomoby:masterfrom
olljanat:use-windowsRS4
Closed

WIP: Use windowsRS4 instead of RS1#37862
olljanat wants to merge 1 commit intomoby:masterfrom
olljanat:use-windowsRS4

Conversation

@olljanat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I noticed that example

testRequires(c, SameHostDaemon, DaemonIsWindowsAtLeastBuild(16299)) // Named pipe support was added in RS3
test does not run on current windowsRS1 node so I wanted to check if that would work by using RS4 which looks to be there (if I understood this one correctly).

So this PR is there now to be able to see if tests passes on that version.

Signed-off-by: Olli Janatuinen <olli.janatuinen@gmail.com>
@olljanat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looks that this change didn't take effect.
Is there some way to try build on newer Windows version or is only way that some changes it on Jenkins side?

If I understand this right we want use Docker-PRs-WoW-RS4-Process (or Docker-PRs-WoW-RS4-HyperV) instead of Docker-PRs-WoW-RS1

@jhowardmsft I can see that at least you have been running something using https://jenkins.dockerproject.org/label/windows-rs4/

@lowenna
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lowenna commented Sep 17, 2018

No, it's a lot more complex. There are dedicated RS1 machines for CI that I maintain. The RS4 (soon to be RS5) machines aren't online. What you changed was the labels for the rebuild tags that maintainers have on this repo to restart CI. There's no actual non-RS1 CI available in this project currently publicly.

@olljanat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok. It bit hard to understand as these Jenkins jobs are not documented online.

@olljanat olljanat closed this Sep 17, 2018
@olljanat olljanat deleted the use-windowsRS4 branch September 30, 2018 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants