-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
MAINT: Simplify doc/conf.py #11657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MAINT: Simplify doc/conf.py #11657
Conversation
|
... now also removing the SphinxWindows job since it's unhelpful. Can easily restore it in #11656 if a workaround or fix lands in Sphinx |
| 'pyvista', | ||
| report_scraper, | ||
| mne.viz._scraper._MNEQtBrowserScraper(), | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's okay to simplify this -- devs who want to build docs should have these installed I think.
drammock
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM so far! assuming there's more given the CI skip tags in your last commit?
No I just wanted to skip the ones that this shouldn't affect. But I could do a full run without any skips if it would help everyone sleep better at night :) The failure is |
good enough for me then. |
should we add an ignore for that in this PR then? |
|
We can just wait a day or two for joblib/joblib#1437 to fix their intersphinx refs |
I realized
build_dev_htmlwas a relic of when we used to inject/modify our build based on being dev or stable. Removing this we can simplify ourMakefileto avoidmake html_dev-noplot-- we can just domake html-noplotas the result is the same. So I've simplified a bunch of stuff and tried to keep aliases for the old commands. I also updated to a newer sphinx iterator to avoid a Sphinx 6 warning.Note that the CircleCI artifacts redirector won't point to a valid file on this PR but it should once the PR is merged, as the redirector action only runs the
mainversion of the action.Helps a little bit with #11507