Skip to content

Clean up CI job for R#5232

Merged
harupy merged 4 commits into
mlflow:masterfrom
harupy:clean-up-r-job
Jan 9, 2022
Merged

Clean up CI job for R#5232
harupy merged 4 commits into
mlflow:masterfrom
harupy:clean-up-r-job

Conversation

@harupy

@harupy harupy commented Jan 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Signed-off-by: harupy 17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Clean up R job.

  • Remove spark related commands since we've removed mleap.
  • Fix paths in R scripts so we can run everything in mlflow/R/mlflow.
  • Remove codecov

How is this patch tested?

Existing checks

Does this PR change the documentation?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Make sure the changed pages / sections render correctly by following the steps below.
  1. Check the status of the ci/circleci: build_doc check. If it's successful, proceed to the
    next step, otherwise fix it.
  2. Click Details on the right to open the job page of CircleCI.
  3. Click the Artifacts tab.
  4. Click docs/build/html/index.html.
  5. Find the changed pages / sections and make sure they render correctly.

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs. label Jan 7, 2022
@harupy harupy requested a review from WeichenXu123 January 7, 2022 12:59
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
harupy added 2 commits January 8, 2022 11:56
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
@harupy

harupy commented Jan 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Hi @lorenzwalthert could you also take a look at this PR?

Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
@lorenzwalthert

lorenzwalthert commented Jan 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me. As far as the {mleap} dependency goes (as mentioned in the description of the PR), I think there are reasonable chances that RStudio will bring it back to CRAN (it sometimes happens that packages get temporariliy archived because not fixed on time), then we'll have to revert these changes here.

@harupy

harupy commented Jan 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@lorenzwalthert Thanks for the comment. Yeah, we'll have to if mleap is back on CRAN.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants