Move mleap to Enhances section in DESCRIPTION#5162
Conversation
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
mleap to Enhances section in DESCRIPTION
| Enhances: | ||
| mleap |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Without this section, R CMD check would complain:
https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/runs/4514454297?check_suite_focus=true#step:14:197
── R CMD check results ────────────────────────────────────── mlflow 1.22.1 ────
Duration: 42s
❯ checking dependencies in R code ... WARNING
Warning: '::' or ':::' import not declared from: ‘mleap’
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Package-Dependencies explains what the Enhances field means:
Finally, the ‘Enhances’ field lists packages “enhanced” by the package at hand, e.g., by providing methods for classes from these packages, or ways to handle objects from these packages (so several packages have ‘Enhances: chron’ because they can handle datetime objects from chron even though they prefer R’s native datetime functions). Version requirements can be specified, but are currently not used. Such packages cannot be required to check the package: any tests which use them must be conditional on the presence of the package. (If your tests use e.g. a dataset from another package it should be in ‘Suggests’ and not ‘Enhances’.)
Not sure if this is the right approach to suppress the error above.
Signed-off-by: harupy 17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Move
mleapto theEnhancessection inDESCRIPTIONto avoid encountering an error duringR CMD check.How is this patch tested?
Confirmed
R CMD checksucceeds now.Does this PR change the documentation?
ci/circleci: build_doccheck. If it's successful, proceed to thenext step, otherwise fix it.
Detailson the right to open the job page of CircleCI.Artifactstab.docs/build/html/index.html.Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples: Example codearea/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/projects: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows: Windows supportLanguage
language/r: R APIs and clientslanguage/java: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/breaking-change- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/none- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/feature- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes