Skip to content

Unpin alembic in setup requirements#4810

Closed
dbczumar wants to merge 1 commit into
mlflow:masterfrom
dbczumar:unpin_alembic
Closed

Unpin alembic in setup requirements#4810
dbczumar wants to merge 1 commit into
mlflow:masterfrom
dbczumar:unpin_alembic

Conversation

@dbczumar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: dbczumar corey.zumar@databricks.com

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Unpin alembic in setup requirements

How is this patch tested?

Unit tests

Release Notes

MLflow now supports additional Alembic versions: > 1.4.1

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

Signed-off-by: dbczumar <corey.zumar@databricks.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/build Build and test infrastructure for MLflow rn/bug-fix Mention under Bug Fixes in Changelogs. labels Sep 15, 2021
Comment thread setup.py
"""
CORE_REQUIREMENTS = SKINNY_REQUIREMENTS + [
"alembic<=1.4.1",
"alembic!=1.4.1",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is some bug in alembic==1.4.1 fixed in greater version ? What's the bug here make us exclude alembic==1.4.1 ?

@jbvaningen jbvaningen mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2022
29 tasks
@harupy harupy mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2022
29 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/build Build and test infrastructure for MLflow rn/bug-fix Mention under Bug Fixes in Changelogs.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants