Related Issues/PRs

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Adds the FURB148 (unnecessary-enumerate) rule from refurb to detect cases where enumerate() is used but either the index or value is discarded.

Changes:

• Added FURB148 to pyproject.toml lint rules
• Fixed 4 violations by replacing enumerate() with direct iteration where only values were used:
  • examples/pytorch/HPOExample/hpo_mnist.py - training loop iteration
  • mlflow/utils/proto_json_utils.py - protobuf list value construction
  • tests/genai/datasets/test_fluent.py - trace ID iteration
  • tests/store/tracking/test_sqlalchemy_store.py - configuration iteration

The rule enforces cleaner iteration patterns: use for item in items when only values are needed, or for i in range(len(items)) when only indices are needed.

How is this PR tested?

• Existing unit/integration tests
• New unit/integration tests
• Manual tests

Does this PR require documentation update?

• No. You can skip the rest of this section.
• Yes. I've updated:
  • Examples
  • API references
  • Instructions

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

• No. You can skip the rest of this section.
• Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

• area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging
• area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
• area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
• area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
• area/evaluation: MLflow model evaluation features, evaluation metrics, and evaluation workflows
• area/gateway: MLflow AI Gateway client APIs, server, and third-party integrations
• area/prompts: MLflow prompt engineering features, prompt templates, and prompt management
• area/tracing: MLflow Tracing features, tracing APIs, and LLM tracing functionality
• area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
• area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
• area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
• area/docs: MLflow documentation pages

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

• rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
• rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
• rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
• rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
• rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

Should this PR be included in the next patch release?

• Yes (this PR will be cherry-picked and included in the next patch release)
• No (this PR will be included in the next minor release)

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.