Fix bug in chat sessions view where new sessions created after UI launch are not visible due to incorrect timestamp filtering#18928
Merged
dbczumar merged 3 commits intomlflow:masterfrom Nov 24, 2025
Conversation
The sessions tab was using a different timestamp threshold compared to the traces tab when making network requests. This was caused by the sessions page missing the MonitoringConfigProvider wrapper. Root cause: - TracesV3View wraps its implementation with MonitoringConfigProvider - ExperimentChatSessionsPage was missing this wrapper - Without the provider, useMonitoringConfig falls back to a default config with a different dateNow value, causing timestamp calculations to differ between the two tabs Fix: - Added MonitoringConfigProvider wrapper to ExperimentChatSessionsPage - Now both tabs use the same monitoring context and dateNow value - This ensures consistent timestamp filtering across both tabs The fix follows the exact same pattern as TracesV3View for consistency. Signed-off-by: dbczumar <corey.zumar@databricks.com>
Contributor
|
Documentation preview for 74a27b2 is available at: More info
|
| @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ | |||
| import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary'; | |||
| import { ExperimentChatSessionsGenericErrorState } from './ExperimentChatSessionsGenericErrorState'; | |||
| import { MonitoringConfigProvider } from '../../hooks/useMonitoringConfig'; | |||
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah it looks like this is used in the edge blocked version upstream, but i missed putting it in the OSS version. thanks for the catch!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🛠 DevTools 🛠
Install mlflow from this PR
For Databricks, use the following command:
Related Issues/PRs
#xxxWhat changes are proposed in this pull request?
Fix bug in chat sessions view where new sessions created after UI launch are not visible due to incorrect timestamp filtering
How is this PR tested?
*Before
After
Sessions show up because timestamp filter is correct:
Does this PR require documentation update?
Release Notes
Fix bug causing newly-created chat sessions to be hidden from the UI
Is this a user-facing change?
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingarea/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/evaluation: MLflow model evaluation features, evaluation metrics, and evaluation workflowsarea/gateway: MLflow AI Gateway client APIs, server, and third-party integrationsarea/prompts: MLflow prompt engineering features, prompt templates, and prompt managementarea/tracing: MLflow Tracing features, tracing APIs, and LLM tracing functionalityarea/projects: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs: MLflow documentation pagesHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/none- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/breaking-change- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/feature- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notesShould this PR be included in the next patch release?
Yesshould be selected for bug fixes, documentation updates, and other small changes.Noshould be selected for new features and larger changes. If you're unsure about the release classification of this PR, leave this unchecked to let the maintainers decide.What is a minor/patch release?
Bug fixes, doc updates and new features usually go into minor releases.
Bug fixes and doc updates usually go into patch releases.