Support reading model registry URI from spark conf#10556
Merged
smurching merged 4 commits intomlflow:masterfrom Nov 30, 2023
Merged
Support reading model registry URI from spark conf#10556smurching merged 4 commits intomlflow:masterfrom
smurching merged 4 commits intomlflow:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Sid Murching <sid.murching@databricks.com>
Contributor
|
Documentation preview for 475bb52 will be available here when this CircleCI job completes successfully. More info
|
jerrylian-db
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
Collaborator
jerrylian-db
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall looks good! Before landing can you do a manual test of this change that shows that the Spark conf is capable of setting the registry URI in a Databricks cluster?
Co-authored-by: Jerry Liang <66143562+jerrylian-db@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Murching <smurching@gmail.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
Thanks @jerrylian-db ! I did the manual test, I'll rerun it with the latest changes to make sure it still works before merging |
…e if set Signed-off-by: Sid Murching <sid.murching@databricks.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🛠 DevTools 🛠
Install mlflow from this PR
Checkout with GitHub CLI
Related Issues/PRs
#xxxWhat changes are proposed in this pull request?
Support reading model registry URI from spark conf, to allow for easier configuration in environments where setting environment variables is difficult.
How is this PR tested?
Does this PR require documentation update?
Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples: Example codearea/gateway: AI Gateway service, Gateway client APIs, third-party Gateway integrationsarea/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/recipes: Recipes, Recipe APIs, Recipe configs, Recipe Templatesarea/projects: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows: Windows supportLanguage
language/r: R APIs and clientslanguage/java: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/none- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/breaking-change- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/feature- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes