Merged
Conversation
|
|
Contributor
|
Thanks! Makes sense to me |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am a PM at https://github.com/James-Yu/LaTeX-Workshop. We are extracting the latex grammars to make a basic language extension for latex, which will be a built-in extension in VS Code, see James-Yu/LaTeX-Workshop#2983. The new extension is developed at https://github.com/jlelong/vscode-latex-basics.
Latex fenced code blocks in markdown are currently supported through a grammar injection carried by the LaTeX-Workshop extension. We believe that once the latex grammars are provided as a built-in extension in VS Code, latex fenced code blocks should be directly handle by the markdown grammars, see jlelong/vscode-latex-basics#1. Hence this PR. What do you think?