Conversation
14fe4dd to
9471311
Compare
|
Probably won't be green on first run so you need to trigger a second one shortly after the first finished. |
Please tell me :) |
triggering a rebuild will most likely only rebuild the failing ports and as such stuff like file conflicts or non declared optional dependencies will no longer fail CI due to the partial rebuild. But i doubt that the |
9471311 to
d56e1ab
Compare
|
Depends on #28485 |
|
I don't get why libphonenumber does not find protobuf-lite. It works locally. In the ci the protobuf-lite file is there and it already finds the header. I don't see a difference between the ci and my local setup. |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
Re-run ci to get the latest error messages. :) |
Check the names: |
d56e1ab to
df8bb43
Compare
df8bb43 to
5686904
Compare
|
@FrankXie05 The last failure is a baseline regression. So maybe already add the review label? |
|
Merge master for ci baseline regression. |
|
@vicroms it would have been good if this pr would have been merged together with vcpkg_find_acquire_program pr since it would have halved the number of world rebuilds. |
|
@FrankXie05 The baseline regression is still there... |
|
@autoantwort we will solve this regression today. :) |
|
I'm ok with merging even with the existing regression on |
LGTM. |
bcc7f0a
Changes from #28126 but triggers a new pipeline run