Merged
Conversation
…hort-command-names
miniksa
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2020
Member
miniksa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm ok with this. Even for folks who don't type slow, shorthand is the cool kids way of doing things.
carlos-zamora
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2020
DHowett
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2020
|
Hello @DHowett! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
|
🎉 Handy links: |
This pull request was closed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds
nt,sp, andftas aliases fornew-tab,split-pane,and
focus-tab, respectively. These do exactly the same thing as theirlong for counterparts, but are just shorter, for those of us who type
slower than a fifth grader 👀
Now you can do
instead of
The pattern I'm using here is that each of these subcommands now has a
little helper lambda that actually sets up the subcommand with the
required arguments, and we just call that lambda twice, once for the
long-form of the command, and again for the short.
I imagine that in the future, we won't necessarily have short-forms for
every subcommands, so if there are future conflicts we'd have to figure
that out pre-emptively, but these all seem like they'll need a short
form.
Closes #5466